While we don't agree with Sedevacantism the Dimonds do excellent work on EENS. Here is an excellent job on the controversy of Pius IX:
The Catholic Vox --- a call for Vatican III--(understanding no salvation outside the Church)
Home-page "Every question you ever wanted answered about the dogma 'No Salvation Outside the Church" Vatican III in the post is fictitious but also serious. We hope for a REAL Third Vatican Council to clear up the mess of the past 50 years. This blog hopefully will give some insights Vatican III--Session I
PDF book Baptism of Desire
Friday, May 3, 2024
Pope Pius IX Did Not Teach Salvation Outside The Church
Saturday, February 4, 2023
The Errors of the Laisneyites
Catholic Vox editor: Here we present an older defense of EENS defened by Michael Malone, against Fr. Laisney of the SSPX.
=================================================
Sunday, January 1, 2023
The Catholic Dogma -- Book by Rev. Michael Müller, C.SS.R
The Catholic Dogma - Contents
The Catholic Dogma
by Rev. Michael Müller, C.SS.R
"Extra Ecclesiam Nullus omnino Salvatur."
"Out of the Church there is positively no Salvation." - Fourth Lateran Council, 1015
"Error, cui non resistur, approbatur; et Veritas, cum minime defensatur."
"Not to oppose erroneous Doctrine is to approve of it, and not to defend at all true Doctrine is to suppress it." - Innocent III.
Index
Preface
Chapter I. Introductory
Chapter II. The Infallible and only True Guide to Heaven
Chapter III. The Great Revolt Against Christ
Chapter IV. Dishonesty of His Impudence Bishop Coxe
Chapter V. Refutation of the False Assertions of Rev'ds Sir Oracle, Cronin and Young.
Chapter V - PART I.
There is no salvation out of the Church.§ 1. S.O begins to comment on some answers, contained in our little work, "Familiar Explanation of Christian Doctrine," (first edition)
§ 2. S.O. continues to speak ex cathedra.
§ 3. S.O. examines and explains the question and answer, "Have Protestants any faith in Christ? A. They never had.
§ 4. What Catholic faith is.
§ 5. What Protestants' belief in Christ is.
§ 6. More false oracles of Sir Oracle.
§ 7. S.O. declares truth to be rant and abuse.
§ 8. S.O. continues to declare false what is true.
§ 9. S.O. declares wholly untrue what he cannot understand.
§ 10. S.O. avows that our conclusion is correct, but tells more d--d lies.
§ 11. S.O. declares that the final sentence of the Eternal Judge, "I know you not--Depart from me, etc." will fall, not on Protestants, but only on bad Catholics; but from his own words it is proved that Protestants, too, are included in that sentence.
§ 12. S.O. declares the honest life of Protestants a standing reproach to bad Catholics.
§ 13. S.O.'s. pharisaical language.
Those who live in heresy without being guilty of the sin of heresy.
§ 1. Natural Law.
§ 2. The written Law.
§ 3. The New Law or the Law of Grace.
§ 4. Conscience in general.
§ 5. Kinds of conscience:1. The right or true conscience.
2. The certain conscience.
3. The timorous or tender conscience.
4. The doubtful conscience.
5. The lax conscience.
6. The perplexed conscience.
7. The scrupulous conscience.
8. The erroneous or false conscience.§ 6. What heretics are not guilty of the sin of heresy -- Refutation of Rev. A. Young's erroneous doctrine on divine faith of material heretics.
§ 7. Invincible or inculpable ignorance neither saves nor damns a person.
§ 8. How Almighty God leads to salvation those who are inculpably ignorant of the truths of salvation.
§ 9. Those who sincerely seek the true religion.
§ 10. S.O. on confession.
§ 11. S.O. points out the road to heaven for heathen and Protestants of every denomination.
§ 12. S.O. gives us credit for our correct doctrine in a way very dishonorable to himself.
§ 13. S.O. as Catechist.
§ 14. Liberalism condemned by the Church.
Monday, August 1, 2022
Karl Rahner and the Unspoken Framework of (Much of) Modern Theology - OnePeterFive
Charles Coulombe’s interesting remark in a recent article that Pius XII, for all his intransigence against dogmatic modernism, allowed Father Karl Rahner, S.J., to be the editor of the prestigious Denzinger prompted me to take up the question of Rahner’s theology and the immense influence it has had on modern Catholic discourse. His influence is such that it is no longer even felt or perceived as such, but has successfully created an atmosphere, a set of implicit assumptions, a mental miasma within which many theologians and students work without even realizing that it is Rahnerian rather than Catholic. Just as for many centuries nearly every work of theology and spirituality bore the unmistakable imprint of St. Thomas—whether he was expressly cited or not—so too, the unmistakable imprint of the Jesuit of Innsbruck is to be found nearly everywhere, including in authors who are styled “conservative.”[1]
Inevitably, a figure of Rahner’s magnitude, who published dozens of volumes of dense material, is not someone it is easy to summarize, and I offer the following “big picture” fully recognizing that it will lack nuance. However, I am convinced there is a big picture at work; that we can accurately identify what it is; and that it is sufficient for assessing his impact and raising critical questions about it. Every thinker has certain guiding ideas that coalesce around a few major themes, and if one can find out what those are, one has a sort of “key” to the rest.
Saturday, July 9, 2022
Explaining the Faith - Freemasonry: Meaning and Mission
What is Freemasonry and why does the Catholic Church condemn it? Is it justified or a misunderstanding? Join Fr. Chris Alar as he gives the history and meaning behind this secret society and what their defined mission actually is.
Roe v. Wade
We can only praise God for the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Not much else to say. Mary Immaculate Queen Triumph and Reign !!
Monday, May 23, 2022
Saint Ambrose and Valentinian
from web.archive.org The whole fascinating story is well documented in the book by Bro. Robert Mary, “Father Feeney and The Truth About Salvation”,
An often used example of a candidate for supposed "baptism of desire" was the young Roman Emperor, Valentinian II, a catechumen who, at the age of twenty, was assassinated in the year 392. He had planned to be baptized in Milan by his dear friend, Saint Ambrose. The memorial oration delivered by the Saint is constantly cited as a "proof" that the early Church believed in "baptism of desire." The quote from the oration usually begins with these words:
But I hear you grieve because he did not receive the Sacrament of Baptism . . .
Let us stop Saint Ambrose at this point and reflect on what he just
said. All of the faithful assembled for the memorial service are grieved. Why are they
grieved? Saint Ambrose says they are grieved because there is no evidence that the
Emperor, a known catechumen, had been baptized before his death. But if "baptism of
desire" was something contained in the "Deposit of Faith" and part of the
Apostolic doctrine, why would they be grieved? Did not Valentinian earnestly desire
Baptism?
Wednesday, March 30, 2022
Was the Fatima Consecration Valid?
Here is a good discussion of the Fatima consecration. We at Catholic Vox think it was properly done. Only time will tell if it was. Obviously it was not done properly before because there was no dramatics conversion of Russia.
Sunday, October 17, 2021
Why do we have abortion in this country?
Monday, September 20, 2021
Feeneyites are Mean
We at Catholic Vox have tried to be as charitable in language as best we can. "Do unto others as you would have done to you." But when dealing with truth and error, those in error will take offense that we say they are wrong.
Although we at Catholic Vox don't consider ourselves technically Feeneyites. Many Feeneyites do not hold that BoD (Baptism of Desire) is heretical, neither did Father Feeney himself.