Showing posts with label current crisis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label current crisis. Show all posts

Monday, August 1, 2022

Karl Rahner and the Unspoken Framework of (Much of) Modern Theology - OnePeterFive

 

onepeterfive.com


Peter Kwasniewski, PhD

Charles Coulombe’s interesting remark in a recent article that Pius XII, for all his intransigence against dogmatic modernism, allowed Father Karl Rahner, S.J., to be the editor of the prestigious Denzinger prompted me to take up the question of Rahner’s theology and the immense influence it has had on modern Catholic discourse. His influence is such that it is no longer even felt or perceived as such, but has successfully created an atmosphere, a set of implicit assumptions, a mental miasma within which many theologians and students work without even realizing that it is Rahnerian rather than Catholic. Just as for many centuries nearly every work of theology and spirituality bore the unmistakable imprint of St. Thomas—whether he was expressly cited or not—so too, the unmistakable imprint of the Jesuit of Innsbruck is to be found nearly everywhere, including in authors who are styled “conservative.”[1]

Inevitably, a figure of Rahner’s magnitude, who published dozens of volumes of dense material, is not someone it is easy to summarize, and I offer the following “big picture” fully recognizing that it will lack nuance. However, I am convinced there is a big picture at work; that we can accurately identify what it is; and that it is sufficient for assessing his impact and raising critical questions about it. Every thinker has certain guiding ideas that coalesce around a few major themes, and if one can find out what those are, one has a sort of “key” to the rest.

Saturday, July 9, 2022

Explaining the Faith - Freemasonry: Meaning and Mission

 What is Freemasonry and why does the Catholic Church condemn it? Is it justified or a misunderstanding? Join Fr. Chris Alar as he gives the history and meaning behind this secret society and what their defined mission actually is.

Roe v. Wade

 We can only praise God for the overturning of Roe v. Wade.  Not much else to say. Mary Immaculate Queen Triumph and Reign !!

Wednesday, March 30, 2022

Was the Fatima Consecration Valid?

Here is a good discussion of the Fatima consecration. We at Catholic Vox think it was properly done.  Only time will tell if it was. Obviously it was not done properly before because there was no dramatics conversion of Russia.



Monday, August 16, 2021

Bishop Joseph Strickland good man follows Christ

 The dogma EENS is really just "follow Christ--there is no other way to the Father, i.e. Salvation"

Sunday, July 18, 2021

History of the Boston "Heresy" Case (echoes of Fr. Altman)

[ editor: We have noticed thing going missing on the internet. We were fortunate to be on the net when things were still open and free so learning the history of the Fr. Feeney Case was fairly easy. So to save from obscurity, the perceptive from Fr. Feeney's point of view.

What is happening to Fr. Altman is very similar to what happened to Fr. Feeney but no one was aware, as Fr. Feeney was, that the liberals had taken over many parts of the Church.  Below is an except from the book : "Fr. Feeney and the Truth About Salvation" by Bro. Robert Mary. We would also recomend another book "They Fought the Good Fight" by Br. Thomas Mary Sennott]
 

web.archive.org

The Compromisers


"Outside the Church there is no salvation" is a solemnly defined dogma which has always been believed and taught by the Church. Were this not so, it could never have been defined ex cathedra in the first place, for no Pope can define a novelty, a truth not taught by the Church from the beginning. But it has been ignored and/or denied many times throughout the history of the Church. The Orthodox churches of the East and the hundreds upon hundreds of Protestant sects in the West stand as living testimonials to such denials.

But it was not until the middle of the last century that an organized attack on the dogma from within the Church began to take form. The attackers were traitorous Catholics who, unlike their Orthodox and Protestant forebears, did not voluntarily leave the Church but stayed within to do their undermining in secret. These subversives were the fruit of the social, philosophical and theological upheaval of the eighteenth century known as the Masonic French Revolution. Their goal was to subvert the Church. They were exposed and condemned as "modernists" by Pope Saint Pius X, but then they merely burrowed more deeply underground and waited for their time to come. Eventually, as they rose higher and higher in the leadership echelons of the Church, their insidious doctrinal teachings produced many, many well-meaning but misguided dupes. These we call Catholic liberals.

Thursday, July 1, 2021

COALITION FOR CANCELED PRIESTS

 Hopefully this will be a counter reformation to the revolution that has happened inside the Church.

https://canceledpriests.org/

Here is an interview by Alpha News with one of the consultants of the organization, Fr. John Lovell.




These priest are just experiencing what Fr. Feeney experienced so many years ago but had no means like the internet to do much.

Fr. Feeney was just preaching a long held dogma, but was never able to give a defense of himself.

Saturday, June 19, 2021

55 USCCB Cowards Who Don't Love Jesus

We would say more than that. All the bishops are cowards. Other bishops should be calling out the other bishops. We need courageous bishops from a small dioceses calling out the Washington and other cardinals. Will it cause division? Yes.
Is it necessary ? Yes.Will he be attacked? Yes.
Will he lose his office? Probably.
But they would save their soul.
Even the "good bishops" are in danger of losing their souls.

Timothy Gordon calls these men out with righteous anger. There is a little salty language but it is to be expected with such a crime.



Monday, May 24, 2021

Fr. Altman asked to resign.

 Fr. Altman was asked to resign for saying no Catholic can be a Democrat or vote for one. Interview with Taylor Marshall. They touch on a lot of hot button issues and we think Taylor is understanding EENS is key to the crisis.


Thursday, April 29, 2021

Taylor Marshall, Bishop Barron, Karl Rahner and Salvation

 I guess we should be happy for the fame of Bishop Barron no one has caused this reaction in the American Church on the topic of Salvation, since Fr. Feeney; except Fr. Feeney was defending Christ, and Bishop Barron is abandoning Him.  I really like how Taylor was able to be strong and firm, but also kind to Bishop Barron.

Taylor also read The Council of  Florence, seldom heard in Catholic circles even conservative ones. Taylor really nails the problem with Karl Rahner--excellent explanation.  It is hard to get anyone to clearly take on Karl Rahner.

Karl Rahner was the one who edited the Denzinger and put in it the letter to the Bishop of Boston regarding Fr. Feeney, even though it was never published in the Acta Apostolicae Sedis. Rahner also moved the statement of  Pope Zosimus on Salvation of infants to a footnote, thus undermining the doctrine of Limbo.

Karl Rahner has always weakened the need of membership in the Church for Salvation. He was honest enough to state it openly-- that Church Fathers would have rejected that:

"...we have to admit...that the testimony of the Fathers, with regard to the possibility of salvation for someone outside the Church, is very weak. Certainly even the ancient Church knew that the grace of God can be found also outside the Church and even before Faith. But the view that such divine grace can lead man to his final salvation without leading him first into the visible Church, is something, at any rate, which met with very little approval in the ancient Church.

For, with reference to the optimistic views on the salvation of catechumens as found in many of the Fathers, it must be noted that such a candidate for baptism was regarded in some sense or other as already 'Christianus', and also that certain Fathers, such as Gregory Nazianzen and Gregory of Nyssa deny altogether the justifying power of love or of the desire for baptism.

Hence it will be impossible to speak of a consensus dogmaticus in the early Church regarding the possibility of salvation for the non-baptized, and especially for someone who is not even a catechumen. In fact, even St. Augustine, in his last (anti-pelagian) period, no longer maintained the possibility of a baptism by desire. "
(Rahner, Karl, Theological Investigations, Volume II, Man in the Church, Translated by Karl H. Kruger, pp.40,41, 57 Or. 40, 23 (PG 36, 3890), 58 'Sermo contra dilationem Baptismi' (PG 46, 424), 59 Cf. Fr. Hoffmann, Der Kirchenbegriff des hl. Augustinus (Munich 1933), pp.221 sqq., 381 sqq., 464 sqq., New York, The Seabury Press, 1975.)



It is hard to excuse Bishop Barron's ignorance. I hope the push back on his recent sermon will finally help him to see his mistake.


Wednesday, April 28, 2021

Fr. Mark Goring and EENS

 Father Mark Goring seems to be a good priest. He wants to follow Jesus in all he teaches without compromise. He has challenged Bishop Barron in no uncertain terms using scripture. Again he is a charismatic Catholic, but unlike Ralph Martin, he doesn't make the compromise ('some people are saved outside the Church--though few') of BoD at least not in this video.

Please pray for him because I don't think he realizes he has just touched Satan in the Church right in the pupil of his eye. This is the center of the crisis. The Dogma ( EENS) is like the hair of Samson in the Church. Once it is proclaimed without compromise, we will see a revival of the Faith.

Monday, April 19, 2021

A Church in Crisis--with Ralph Martin

 Here is two part interview with Ralph Martin. He is approaching EENS from a different point of view. He is using pure scripture to make his point. Much like Bishop Hay did way back when.

Monday, August 5, 2019

EENS Denied Again by Novus Ordo Theology

This a great video to see the dangers of the new theology. The friar in the video is clueless on how wrong his is.






While I could understand a rationalization of all the baptized might be in some way related to the Church thus making salvation a possibility, in some very limited cases.

To go so far as to say those who do not believe in Christ or deny him can be saved is to the deny the Dogma of the Faith--EENS.

Pope Pius IX, First Vatican Council, Sess. 3, Chap. 2 on Revelation, 1870, de fide: “Hence, also, that understanding of its sacred dogmas must be perpetually retained, which Holy Mother Church HAS ONCE DECLARED; and there MUST NEVER BE A RECESSION FROM THAT MEANING under the specious name of a deeper understanding.”[Denzinger 1800]

Pope Pius IX, First Vatican Council, Sess. 3, Canons on Faith and Reason, #3, 1870, de fide:
If anyone says that it is possible that at some time, given the advancement of knowledge, a sense may be assigned to the dogmas propounded by the church which is DIFFERENT FROM THAT WHICH THE CHURCH HAS UNDERSTOOD and understands: let him be anathema.


Sunday, September 16, 2018

Orphans of Orthodoxy (what is a Trad ?) ~ Faith, Family and Friends in the Age of Apostasy ~



By CHRISTOPHER GAWLEY
If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.
- Luke 14:26
It is a difficult day to be alive.
Just a few generations ago, the Catholic touchstones of the three “F’s” (friendship, family and faith) were the three “C’s” (convergence, consistency and constancy). We lived a shared heritage in which we were born, lived, married, celebrated, mourned and died together. Catholicism provided a consistent framework for both knowledge and behaviour — for ethics and morality. The expectations of how to live and how others expected us to live was clear and constant. In other words, our relationships — with God, our kin and our friends and acquaintances — converged with an intimacy that only a shared culture can provide.

As any Catholic with eyes and ears can testify, we live in a very different time. The common culture that defined the lives of Catholics is gone; tragically so. Those souls who seek today to keep alive the vestiges of that once glorious Catholic culture have been orphaned — orphaned by the very leaders of the Catholic Church and by almost all other baptised Catholics, including, most painfully, their own families. The restoration is not without its terrible crosses.

Catholics and the Culture of Old
It was not that long ago when the Catholics understood what was expected of them. These expectations were underscored by positive and negative obligations. We were affirmatively expected, for example: to marry in Holy Mother Church; to baptise, raise, and educate our children in the Faith; to support the Church financially, socially and politically; and to take part personally in the sacramental life of the Church. In sum, we were expected to show a commitment to the teachings of Jesus Christ by being faithful to the Catholic Church. We enjoyed what was then a mutually symbiotic relationship: we supported, loved and venerated Holy Mother Church and, in turn, she jealously guarded us, her flock.

EXPOSED! Vatican II & the Viganò Effect

We at Catholicvox have wanted to stay focused on the doctrinal problems in the Church, but this fiasco, needs comment. While we at Catholicvox are not technically Trads. We have always been sympathetic to the Trads.

For the Neo-Catholics to call Trads, "Rad-Trads" (ie. Radical Traditionalist), always made us bristle. How could being just Catholic as all the Church was before Vatican II be considered, RADICAL?

While we don't see a return, to the Traditional Tridentine Mass, (TLM--Tradition Latin Mass) any time soon, since we have fallen away from the norm of Sacred Tradition so much. We do hope for a "Latinization" of the Novus Ordo.

We also bristle, at calling the TLM, the "Extraordinary Form." Why ? Because this is a ploy to distance  the norm of tradition from the TLM. It also changed the name of the Novus Ordo to "Ordinary Form." Why? Because the term Novus Ordo is very close to the Masonic, "Novus Ordo Seclorum,"-- The New World Order. This is not by chance imho.

The Church had a hostel takeover at Vatican II. We still think God can use this mess for good, but let's be honest-- it is a mess.

We know many good men who wouldn't dare to enter seminary for fear of not being allowed to preach the dogmas of the Faith, or fear of being raped. 


Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Will Many Be Saved? What Vatican II Actually Teaches and Its Implications for the New Evangelization

OK it isn't a perfect book but it is a step in the right direction. Ralph Martin has taken on Rahner's Anonymous Christian theory and Von Balthazar's "Dare We Hope" theory. He still has more to learn about the dogma EENS but I have said for a long time that Catholic  charismatics are more open to the idea of needing to take Jesus as Lord and Savior, which is the first step in the puzzle palace game of mirrors that has afflicted the dogma. So let's be patient and promote the good this book can do to opening up the dialog in educated circles.
http://www.amazon.com/Will-Many-Saved-Implications-Evangelization/dp/0802868878

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Bp. Athanasius Schneider’s proposal for a “Syllabus” on the correct interpretation of Vatican II

His Excellency Most Rev. Athanasius Schneider, auxiliary bishop in Karaganda, Kazakhstan, has made quite a splash over the last few years.
He first caught people’s eyes at the Synod on the Eucharist in 205 in Rome where he gave an intervention, as a priest, while secretary of the liturgy committee of the bishops’ conference in Kazakhstan.  He suggested to the Fathers of the Synod, if you can believe this, that faith in and devotion to the Eucharist wasn’t all that it should be in some places.  He suggested that to foster faith and devotion we should perhaps kneel and receive Communion – I am not making this up – on the tongue rather than in the hand.
Athanasius SchneiderHis ideas found favor in some high quarter, for soon thereafter he was consecrated bishop.  A book with his radical views was published by the Vatican’s own publishing house with a preface by the then-secretary for the Congregation for Divine Worship, Malcolm, now Cardinal, Ranjith.   His book Dominus Est is in now in English.
On 17 December 2010, again in Rome, Bp. Schneider gave an address at a conference which attracted more attention.
In the face of chaos which has been caused by a misinterpretation of the Second Vatican Council, by liberals who want to use the Council as a tool to force the Church into conformity with the world, or traditionalists who desire to reject the Council, Bp. Schneider proposed that there should be a document with magisterial effect which corrects false interpretations and offers positive guidelines.  This would be a sort of “Syllabus”, both of errors and proper principles.

Monday, January 18, 2010

Temple Morgan -- Good fruit of No Salvation Outside the Church

(As the disclaimer above points out members of CFT are not "Feeneyites." I even loathe the term-made by the opponents of the dogma-editor). Beside the more famous characters of the "Boston Hersy" case there was one I had been looking for for awhile but have come to find out that he has died. His name was :
Temple Morgan

Temple was a convert of Fr. Feeney's and his grand uncle was J.P. Morgan. His family was very much against his conversion. I think he would be one for us to pray for/to in helping us to work out this controversy in the Church. He lived one of the hardest lives one can in the Church, he was a Trappist monk.  He seems to be a very good fruit produced in the Boston case I would like if more was known about him.

click here for his obituary

Sunday, December 13, 2009

The Church's Vocation Crisis

[CFT- editor: I came across this article the other day and thought I should share it with you. I think it explains why there is a vocation crisis in the Church today. Since most Catholics think there is salvation outside the Church, why should they bother to sacrifice themselves to evangelize the world?

What motivated a young man in those days to dedicate his life to the foreign missions in spite of incredible hardships and probable death at the hands of persecutors? Like his contemporaries John was deeply convinced that all non-Christians would go to hell for all eternity. The thought that millions of souls would suffer eternal fire (as he believed) was enough to prompt him to make the hardest sacrifices]


New Guinea Battlefield
Bl. John Baptist Mazzucconi Martyr of New Guinea 
 Br.Thomas Mary Sennott, Obl. S.B., M.I.C.M.

A few weeks ago I was browsing in the biography section of our monastery library, when a book with an attractive blue cover caught my eye. It was a color photograph of a beach in the Pacific islands with cocoanut trees and grass shacks. It must have looked idyllic to anyone who had never been there. I suspected correctly that it was New Guinea, where I had spent some time with the Fifth Air Force during World War II. The book was Mazzucconi of Woodlark, Priest and Martyr by Fr. Nicholas Maestrini, PIME. I had never heard of Blessed John Mazzucconi and Woodlark didn't ring a bell, but looking at the photographs, I noticed one with the caption, "Guazup Bay, the scene of Blessed John's martyrdom." Suddenly a bell rang: "Goosap" (evidently the best the G.I.s could do with Guazup), and a song popped into my head which I hadn't heard for over fifty years, from 1943 and 1944, to be exact. Sung to the tune of "The Blues in the Night" it went something like: